Exception Handling in Linux

I’ve been studying exception handling in Linux. I’m aware (to some extent) of the signal mechanism used by Linux to notify processes of SIGSEGV, SIGFPE, SIGINT etc. To trap these signals, they need to be explicitly registered using the sigaction.

My questions:

  1. Is there a ‘catch-all’ exception handler? Using the signal mechanism, I need to explicitly register for the signals. But I want to capture all signals, and ensure that wherever I can, I’d show a message to user and the app just doesn’t quit. And get some logs for diagnosis. Windows has a ‘catch-all’ exception handler set using SetUnhandledExceptionHandler. Does Linux have something similar?
  2. From what I’ve read so far, signals seem to be the only way to capture exceptions (like SIGINT, SIGSEGV, SIGFPE etc.). In case I need to use signals, what should the behavior be? If main thread raises SIGSEGV, then it will be stuck in a loop (code which raised SIGSEGV ↔ exception handler) and will I get to show some message to user? If a worker thread (created by app) hits a SIGSEGV, then I intend to kill the worker thread (therefore avoiding the loop) and signal the main thread to show a message to user and unwind gracefully.

I intend to use GTK for the app’s UI (including the message screen). I’m looking for a Linux recommended way to handle exceptions and exit gracefully, to provide a good user experience.

Handling exceptions and signals in Linux requires a nuanced approach, especially for complex applications where you want to capture all signals, log errors, notify the user, and maintain stability. Linux does not have a direct equivalent to Windows’ SetUnhandledExceptionHandler, but there are several strategies for handling signals, managing exceptions, and achieving graceful exits in your application.

1. Catching All Signals in Linux

Unlike Windows, Linux does not offer a “catch-all” exception handler to catch all signals automatically. However, you can use a signal handler to capture many signals explicitly. Here’s how you can approach it:

Using sigaction for Multiple Signals

You can set up a generic handler function and register it for various signals with sigaction. Here’s a simple example:

#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>

void signal_handler(int signum) {
    printf("Caught signal %d\n", signum);
    // Log, clean up resources, and show a message to the user here
    if (signum == SIGSEGV) {
        // Handle segmentation faults specifically if needed
    }
    exit(1); // Terminate gracefully
}

int main() {
    struct sigaction sa;
    sa.sa_handler = signal_handler;
    sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
    sa.sa_flags = 0;

    // Register multiple signals to the same handler
    sigaction(SIGSEGV, &sa, NULL);
    sigaction(SIGINT, &sa, NULL);
    sigaction(SIGFPE, &sa, NULL);
    // Register additional signals as needed

    // Application code here

    while (1) {
        sleep(1);
    }
    return 0;
}

2. Handling SIGSEGV in Threads

If you encounter SIGSEGV in a worker thread, managing the behavior is critical to avoid an infinite loop of errors. Here’s how you can approach it:

  • Segmentation Faults (SIGSEGV): In a multi-threaded app, when a worker thread causes a segmentation fault (SIGSEGV), the default behavior terminates the entire process. To change this, you can:
    • Register a signal handler for SIGSEGV that captures the signal, logs it, and then exits or restarts the thread.
    • Avoid Resuming After SIGSEGV: Attempting to resume after SIGSEGV can often lead to further instability or undefined behavior. Instead, you can signal the main thread (using a flag or IPC mechanism) to notify the user and gracefully exit.
  • Exit the Worker Thread: If you trap the SIGSEGV signal in a worker thread, you can programmatically exit the thread to prevent it from affecting the entire application. Use pthread_exit() in the handler if feasible to terminate the problematic thread cleanly.

Example Approach for Worker Threads

To handle exceptions and signals in a way that informs the main thread to respond gracefully:

  1. Signal Handling in Each Thread: Register handlers in each worker thread.
  2. Communication to Main Thread: Use a shared variable, pipe, or other IPC method to notify the main thread of the issue.

Here’s a conceptual snippet to illustrate:

#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>

void signal_handler(int signum) {
    printf("Caught signal %d in worker thread\n", signum);
    pthread_exit(NULL); // Exit the worker thread
}

// Worker thread function
void* worker_thread(void* arg) {
    // Register signal handler for the worker thread
    struct sigaction sa;
    sa.sa_handler = signal_handler;
    sigemptyset(&sa.sa_mask);
    sa.sa_flags = 0;
    sigaction(SIGSEGV, &sa, NULL);

    // Cause a segmentation fault intentionally
    int* p = NULL;
    *p = 10; // This will cause SIGSEGV

    return NULL;
}

int main() {
    pthread_t thread;
    pthread_create(&thread, NULL, worker_thread, NULL);

    // Main thread can monitor threads here and react to signals

    pthread_join(thread, NULL);
    printf("Worker thread terminated\n");

    return 0;
}

3. Handling GTK UI for Error Messages and Graceful Exits

For a GTK application, you can display a message dialog from within the signal handler, though direct GUI operations are generally discouraged from signal handlers. Instead, consider:

  • Signaling the Main Thread: Use inter-thread communication to notify the main UI thread about the error.
  • Display a GTK Dialog: In the main thread, open a GTK dialog to inform the user and offer an option to either retry, continue with limited functionality, or exit gracefully.

4. Logging and Debugging for Diagnosis

Logging exceptions and crashes is key for debugging. In a signal handler, avoid performing complex I/O operations directly. Instead, set a flag or use an external logger with minimal dependencies. You could also:

  • Generate Core Dumps: By enabling core dumps (ulimit -c unlimited), you can analyze the dumps post-crash to diagnose issues.
  • Attach Debuggers or External Logging Services: Tools like gdb, strace, or external logging services can capture diagnostic data without needing extensive in-app handling.

Recommended Practices Summary

  1. Signal Registration: Register each signal you want to handle with a custom handler via sigaction.
  2. Separate Thread and Main Thread Logic: Use inter-thread communication to notify the main thread of exceptions and respond gracefully.
  3. Avoid Complex Operations in Handlers: Signal handlers should only perform essential tasks; direct GTK operations in handlers are discouraged.
  4. Use Core Dumps for Post-Mortem Analysis: Enabling core dumps allows you to analyze crashes later without extensive in-app handling.

This approach should help you implement a robust error-handling system that not only captures exceptions but also provides users with a stable and informative experience on error occurrence.